Turning the Tide: Securing a $95,000 Jury Verdict in a Conservative Jurisdiction with Strategic Advocacy
We won this case on the basis of our tough knack for presenting persuasive evidence at trial. But the case was truly won also when we were able to get our client to reframe her potential injuries in a way that was most conducive to an optimal outcome. This case was tried in a very conservative jurisdiction and was one of the few plaintiff wins there that year, although one of the Defendants did end up not having to pay.
Challenges
- The case was tried in a highly conservative jurisdiction, where plaintiffs often face significant challenges in obtaining favorable verdicts.
- Convincing the jury to see the case from the plaintiff’s perspective in a venue with a track record of defense-favorable outcomes.
- Addressing the complexities of having multiple defendants, one of whom ultimately avoided payment responsibility.
- Helping the client reframe her injuries in a way that was both accurate and compelling for trial.
Solution
- Developed a strong trial strategy, emphasizing persuasive evidence and effective courtroom presentation to engage the jury.
- Worked closely with the client to reframe her understanding of the injuries in a manner that aligned with the legal standards necessary for a favorable verdict.
- Tailored arguments to resonate with the values and inclinations of the conservative jury, ensuring clarity and relatability.
- Maintained focus on the core facts of the case to overcome jurisdictional biases and secure a plaintiff win.
The Result
- Secured a $95,000 jury verdict, a significant accomplishment in a jurisdiction known for favoring defendants.
- Achieved one of the few plaintiff victories in the area that year, demonstrating the firm’s capability to succeed in challenging environments.
- While one defendant was not held financially responsible, the outcome still provided justice and meaningful compensation for the client.
